I used to think low miles was important. But take a bargain priced vee, do a full detail on the paintwork, replace parts that wear such as shocks, clutch, brakes, seats, gear knobs, linkages, ball joints, etc etc etc. Do the work yourself and your invoices are prob going to be under some of the high prices. Moreover, you result in a car that will feel tighter than one with 5000 miles on the clock. That's my route of thought anyway. Of course, someone boring will prob come on and talk about the number of owners, but I think that's a psycological hang up. the only advantage of paying the high price tag, is of course, you in theory dont have the stress of carrying out all that work. I say stress, because some people won't enjoy that kind of challenge. I say in theory, because you are never guaranteed zero stress when buying a car.
I'm all for higher values than lower ones, but I do think there is too much significance on prices. If you are going to drive this car, then it's a waste of money because the only reason it has a higher value is because of the low miles. Even from an investment point of view,it would make no sense to pay this sort of money. There are much better asset classes to put your money. Then again, there is the bonus of actually owning something you can touch, etc, even if you dont drive it. Just as a hobby for example. That's all fine, and the car is a beauty. Believe me, a part of me would love it. But in the real world, in my opinion, it's overpriced.
There will of course, be someone at the end of the bell-curve, who will buy it.