A
Anonymous
Well I got an update from the insurance the other day - I passed the dog owners details on to the insurance who are getting their legal team to look into the situation. It seems if it was negligence then I can claim through the dog owners pet insurance (providing they have public liability). This would of course mean that I don't need to claim on my own insurance, hence no excess to pay and no claim on my record.
However it seems that the dog owners are disputing the claim by saying that they reckon the damage was done to the car BEFORE I hit the dog!! I wonder why they even have insurance if they're not going to bother using it.... :evil:
My insurance seem to be saying that its up to the dog owners to prove that the damage was there beforehand, which of course is impossible for them.
It just somehow seems wrong that I'm going to have a claim on my clean record if I can't go via their insurance :evil:
However it seems that the dog owners are disputing the claim by saying that they reckon the damage was done to the car BEFORE I hit the dog!! I wonder why they even have insurance if they're not going to bother using it.... :evil:
My insurance seem to be saying that its up to the dog owners to prove that the damage was there beforehand, which of course is impossible for them.
It just somehow seems wrong that I'm going to have a claim on my clean record if I can't go via their insurance :evil: